Red Wings Seek Multi-Asset Return for Larkin, Per Dreger
Detroit's asking price for captain Dylan Larkin is reportedly three to four assets, including two high-end prospects, a top-nine NHL forward, and a first-round pick, according to Darren Dreger. Larkin is signed through 2031 at an $8.7 million cap hit and has control over which teams he would accept. Winnipeg's price for Connor Hellebuyck remains centered on immediate help, possibly a second-line forward or two plus young assets, and he has not reported while suspended.
Dreger outlined Detroit’s desired return for captain Dylan Larkin: three or four assets, including two elite-level prospects, an NHL-ready top-nine forward, and a first-round selection. Larkin’s contract through 2031 at $8.7 million makes him attractive, but his no-trade protection limits which clubs can bid. Detroit recently extended Alex DeBrincat for seven years, leaving Larkin as a major unresolved item.
In Winnipeg, Pagnotta reported Connor Hellebuyck’s asking price remains immediate help—perhaps a second-line forward or two—plus young assets, though talks could pivot toward one current player and more futures. Hellebuyck has stayed away and is suspended without pay. Montreal was reportedly prepared to act on Larkin, but he and his family declined. Larkin has one goal and three points in five games and was booed at Detroit’s home opener.
Count words. First para: Dreger(1) outlined2 Detroit’s3 desired4 return5 for6 captain7 Dylan8 Larkin:9 three10 or11 four12 assets,13 including14 two15 elite-level16 prospects,17 an18 NHL-ready19 top-nine20 forward,21 and22 a23 first-round24 selection.25 Larkin’s26 contract27 through28 2031 29 at30 $8.7 31 million32 makes33 him34 attractive,35 but36 his37 no-trade38 protection39 limits40 which41 clubs42 can43 bid.44 Detroit45 recently46 extended47 Alex48 DeBrincat49 for50 seven51 years,52 leaving53 Larkin54 as55 a56 major57 unresolved58 item.59
Second: In1 Winnipeg,2 Pagnotta3 reported4 Connor5 Hellebuyck’s6 asking7 price8 remains9 imme
" maybe with blank line? They said two labeled sections in plain text, exactly this format: EXPANDED: ... CONTEXT: ... Output only. We can include paragraphs. Need no extra. Ensure no markdown? Plain text. Fine. Potential issue: "two high-end prospects" source says "two ‘A’-quality prospects" and summary says "two high-end prospects". The prompt summary includes "two high-end prospects" exact. But instruction says drawn only from material above, original wording, never copying source phrasing. "high-end prospects" appears in summary. Maybe avoid exact? Use "two premium prospects" or "two top-tier prospects". Let's change to "two premium prospects". "top-nine forward" source exact. Could say "a forward capable of top-nine NHL duty" to avoid. "first-round pick" common. "signed through 2031 at $8.7 million" factual. "controls acceptable destinations" okay. "Alex DeBrincat for seven years" source says seven-year extension. Fine. Revised EXPANDED: Dreger said Detroit seeks three or four a