Sevilla players question VAR after Real Madrid loss

Sevilla's Juan Iglesias and Kike Salas criticized the officiating after a 4-1 defeat to Real Madrid. Both players questioned why VAR did not intervene in an incident involving Arda Guler. They described the incident as a clear red card offense.

Sevilla's Juan Iglesias and Kike Salas spoke after their side's 4-1 loss to Real Madrid. Both questioned why the video assistant referee did not review an incident involving Arda Guler. They believed the moment warranted a sending-off. The match result and the players' comments have brought the officiating decision into focus. (46 words?) Let's count: Sevilla's(1) Juan(2) Iglesias(3) and(4) Kike(5) Salas(6) spoke(7) after(8) their(9) side's(10) 4-1(11) loss(12) to(13) Real(14) Madrid(15). Both(16) questioned(17) why(18) the(19) video(20) assistant(21) referee(22) did(23) not(24) review(25) an(26) incident(27) involving(28) Arda(29) Guler(30). They(31) believed(32) the(33) moment(34) warranted(35) a(36) sending-off(37). The(38) match(39) result(40) and(41) the(42) players'(43) comments(44) have(45) brought(46) the(47) officiating(48) decision(49) into(50) focus(51). 51 words. Under 120. But instruction says 2 short paragraphs. If material thin, ONE careful paragraph. This is one paragraph. But maybe they expect 2 short paragraphs? It says "If material is thin, write ONE careful paragraph..." So okay. But maybe we can do two short paragraphs under 120 total. But "additional factual detail and background drawn ONLY from material above" there isn't much. Could split into two paragraphs: first facts, second situating wider topic. But "if thin, one careful paragraph situating..." Hmm. We can do one paragraph. But format says EXPANDED: 2 short paragraphs... If material thin, write O